From Livemint
Center-Right Owned by HT Media Ltd.Somnath Temple non-veg food ban: Why Supreme Court refused to lift restrictions and what the judges said
What's behind this
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation as “premature” that had sought to stop a prohibition on holding the “Thirukalyana Virundhu” feast during the Chithirai festival in a playground belonging to Sethupathi Higher Secondary School in Madurai. The court’s decision effectively rejected the plea to prevent the feast from being conducted.
AI-generated overview from 2 outlets. It summarises their reporting and adds no reporting of its own.
What each side is saying
One outlet's own words from each side of the spectrum. Quoted, not summarised.
-
left · 2 outlets
New Delhi: The Supreme Court has held that the power to reject a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure can be exercised at any stage of the proceedings, including prior to the registration of the plaint, provided by duly recording the reasons for it. A bench of Justices Ujjal…
-
center · 1 outlet
New Delhi, Nov 6: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to lift the ban on the preparation, sale and storage of non-vegetarian food in the vicinity of Gujarat’s Somnath Temple, but asked the Gujarat High Court to decide the matter expeditiously, preferably within two months, reports Bar & Bench. A…
-
right · 2 outlets
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on November 6, Friday refused to interfere with the Gujarat High Court’s interim order restoring restrictions on the preparation, sale and storage of non-vegetarian food near Somnath Mandir. A Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and Prasanna B. Varale requested the High…
RSS excerpt
The Supreme Court has refused to lift the ban on non-vegetarian food near Gujarat's Somnath Temple. Saying a balance must be maintained, the court asked the Gujarat High Court to decide the restaurant owners' challenge within two months.
