From Sabrang India
Left Owned by Sabrang IndiaSC: Article 142, Mass Amnesties, and the Panchayatisation of the Rule of Law
What's behind this
The Supreme Court on Tuesday examined petitions concerning demonstrations at Delhi’s Ramlila Maidan that are against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, hearing allegations of police excesses, mass detentions and restrictions on journalists. A three‑judge bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and other justices noted that while the constitutional right to protest is protected, it cannot be exercised in a way that paralyses the livelihood of others, stressing a need to balance protest with the right to trade. Earlier remarks from the Court highlighted a ‘protest economy’ and expressed sympathy for affected traders.
AI-generated overview from 2 outlets. It summarises their reporting and adds no reporting of its own.
What each side is saying
One outlet's own words from each side of the spectrum. Quoted, not summarised.
-
left · 1 outlet
Within a month of youth-led protests in Delhi and at least half a dozen other locations, the Supreme Court’s September 1 Order invoked its extraordinary powers under Article 142 to quash criminal cases registered across at least five states. This examines the limitations of this ad hoc…
RSS excerpt
Within a month of youth-led protests in Delhi and at least half a dozen other locations, the Supreme Court’s September 1 Order invoked its extraordinary powers under Article 142 to quash criminal cases registered across at least five states. This examines the limitations of this ad hoc…